An analysis of Thai university foreign language teachers’ teaching styles

Thanatcha Thongsuwan
King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

Phanitphim Sojisirikul
King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

Reference to this paper should be made as follows:
Thongsuwan, T., & Sojisirikul, P. (2016). An analysis of Thai university foreign language teachers’ teaching styles. Asian International Journal of Social Sciences, 16(3), 04 – 26. https://doi.org/10.29139/aijss.20160301

Creative Commons License
All works licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to investigate the perceptions of language teachers on higher education toward their pedagogical styles and to extrapolate the factors that might affect their styles of teaching. The sample consisted of 40 language teachers from the King‟s Mongkut University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thailand. The Teaching Style Inventory questionnaire was adopted and used as the principal means of data collection. Descriptive statistics, frequency and percentages were used to calculate and identify self-perception of the participating language teachers. The results indicated that most of the language teachers perceived themselves by using the Facilitator style regardless of their gender, age range, educational background, or teaching experience while the least perceived style was the Delegator style of teaching. Both styles fall upon student-centered cline, but the latter pedagogical style might be considered difficult to fully adopt and apply to most teaching and learning situations for Thai students practically in an academic institution who are still not yet ready to completely become autonomous learners.

Keywords: perceptions; teaching styles; language teachers; higher education

 

References

Briesmaster, M. & Paredes, B. J. (2015). The relationship between teaching styles and NNPSETs’anxiety levels. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 49, 145-156.

Botas, C. P. P. (2004). Students‟ perceptions of teachers‟ pedagogical styles in higher education. The Journal of Doctoral Research in Education, 4(1), 16-30.

Bota, A. O. & Tulbure, C. (2015). Aspects regarding the relationship between teaching styles and school results. Procedia-Social and Sciences, 203, 285-290.

Brown, H. D. (2007).Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). White Plains: Pearson.

Çakmak, M. (2011). What are prospective teachers’ opinions about their instructors’ teaching styles?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1960-1964.

Çakmak, M. , & Bulut, M. (2005). The perceptions of pre-service teachers about effective teaching and effective teachers. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies (MJES), 10(1), 73-89.

Cooper, T. C. (2001). Foreign language teaching style and personality. Foreign Language  Annals, 34(30), 1-16.

Conti, G. J. (1985). Assessing teaching style in adult education: How and why?. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 8(8), 7-11.

Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhance learning by understanding learning and teaching style. College Teaching, 48, 1-12.

Grasha, A. F. (2002). Teaching with style (2nd ed.). San Bernadino, CA: Alliance Publishers.

Parpala, A. & Sarl, L. Y. (2007). University teachers’ conceptions of good teaching in the units of high-quality education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.009

Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. (2001). Business education students’ preferred learning styles and their teachers; Preferred instructional styles: Do for hire match? Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 43, 137-151. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ638597

Underwood, M. (1991). Effective class management. London, UK: Longman.

Zhang, L. F. (2009). From conceptions of effective teachers to styles of teaching: Implications For higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.01.004

This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper presented at the 14th Developing Real-Life Learning Experiences: STEM Education and Lifelong Learning Skills in the 21st Century at the Faculty of Industrial Education at the King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand on June 17th, 2016.